Xbox 360 VS PS3 2009 Price Comparison – PS3 is the cheapest (No Fanboyism!)

Posted by admin | Mak | Saturday 16 October 2010 1:09 pm
bufalax asked:


Download this picture: img15.imageshack.us Alright, i’m not being a fan boy, compare it to your self. FLAME WARS are NOT accepted in this video. I own both PS3 & 360 and they both are great! 360 is a great console, it is much more costlier than the PS3. PROJECT NATAL FTW!

Joann

25 Comments

  1. Comment by Robert941 — October 19, 2010 @ 5:56 am

    Sherry

    @hashishking1990
    Lol plzzzz Im not gonna keep debating with u but the Stimulus map pack early release on 360 was a fail, it was extremly buggy and for many people it still is, many people bought it but it never could be downloaded after doing so, dont matter anyhow, we’re still getting it

  2. Comment by Robert941 — October 19, 2010 @ 7:06 am

    Elizabeth

    @hashishking1990
    Dont talk **** unless you do know about it, idiot fanboy, Im not a fanboy just for proving you idiots wrong, I got a 360 BTW but Im not gonna BS people about it, its not as great as you guys say it is, both consoles are great but ya 360 will cost you more money in the long run

  3. Comment by hashishking1990 — October 19, 2010 @ 7:09 am

    Leslie

    has ps3 got the new m w 2 map pack yet, nOOOOOOOOOOOO ps3 **** balls people that own ps3s always gets the left overs of what us 360′ers already had so smd [=

  4. Comment by hashishking1990 — October 20, 2010 @ 6:44 pm

    Robert

    @tgizzle829 whos buying a console to sell it again? and no you wouldnt because why would people pay more for the slim if they can get the older one for like 100 less?

  5. Comment by hashishking1990 — October 21, 2010 @ 9:26 pm

    Ruben

    @Robert941 you’re a true fanboy if you know all this info about the consoles LOOOOOOOOOOOOL

  6. Comment by hashishking1990 — October 22, 2010 @ 6:53 pm

    Gertrude

    adpter is like £30 now hd drive £20 xbox £180 12 months live £25 plug an play £10

    = 265

    the ps3 is more then the 360 atm so you can smd (:

    much is ps3 slim? i guessing like £250 so you can get all that xbox **** for £15 more ill rather go for xbox (: ps3 ***** balls

  7. Comment by poopaholictar — October 23, 2010 @ 1:22 pm

    Don

    Th consumer has spoken and they like the xbox 360 over the ps3, this past feb 2010 the 360 outsold the Wii and guess who was in last place, our little friend ps3.

    its pretty hilarious to me!

  8. Comment by soccerskillz95 — October 26, 2010 @ 5:18 am

    David

    @Dolian112 bcoz xbox was released 2 years earlier…….therefore more x boxes……but psn comes with the xbox…..

  9. Comment by PokemonVSdigimon — October 28, 2010 @ 4:31 pm

    Jessica

    Fanboy for the win here…. I don’t give a crap of what you other says, but this is just a freaking ps3 fanboy. lawl!!!!!!!!!!! I have both xbox 360 and ps3, I don’t use the wirless network adapter in the ps3 cuz a wired connection gives me a better connection, and I don’t have one singel blue ray disc… So thats waste of money for me, but for some people there isn’t a wast of money. Still there are both very good consoles but I **** fanboys like this.

  10. Comment by callmeLilSparky — October 29, 2010 @ 12:20 pm

    Jesus

    all the fanboys all their will and all their way can’t stop the way the world works. A game console can not possibly be better that another outside of your opinion and how much you spend depends on how much you buy.

  11. Comment by Robert941 — November 1, 2010 @ 3:42 am

    Sandra

    Yah thx for all the thumbs down, coward. I didnt do tht 2 u.

  12. Comment by Robert941 — November 1, 2010 @ 7:12 am

    Larry

    Once again, complete BS. LIVE doesnt have better connection, and it depends. You mean logging on or playing a game online? 2 seperate connections. PS3 has wireless adaptor, so you cant compare them, 360 doesnt come with a wireless adaptor, but wired , both are the same while logging in, in games PS3 has better connection. It uses a dedicated server to help its connection, LIVE uses host connection on all it multiplats and exclusives, so if host lags u lag. Play GOW online lol, youll see….

  13. Comment by Dolian112 — November 3, 2010 @ 12:29 pm

    Terry

    some ppl don’t have the ability to play on live and live has better connection and less lag and thats why we pay and the psn is extra laggy and if you want to continue this arguement do the videomaker a favor and lets message

  14. Comment by Robert941 — November 5, 2010 @ 2:28 pm

    Brittany

    Also how about you do some research because LIVE doesnt even come close to the ammount of people on PSN. There are only 20mil LIVE accounts, only 10mil of those are GOLD, which is the only way you can play games online, silver only can download some demos and content, but not all of it. PSN has over 21mil ACTIVE users that can play games online. Amazing how 360 has sold more systems,yet it has HALF the people.

  15. Comment by Robert941 — November 8, 2010 @ 6:23 pm

    Christina

    Well maybe cause you bought the game after you bought the PS3 version. Different websites. Games are no difference in price, that was stupid to say.

  16. Comment by Dolian112 — November 10, 2010 @ 3:41 pm

    Lori

    plus he’s comparing an eilite to a 120 gb ps3 nt an arcade to a 120 gb ps3

  17. Comment by Dolian112 — November 13, 2010 @ 4:10 pm

    Antonio

    when did I say anythingabout 60 dollar games I said most games that I have noticed that are 40 or 30 dollars are 30 or 20 on the 360 and if live isn’t funner how come there are more people n live than psn?

  18. Comment by Robert941 — November 15, 2010 @ 10:34 am

    Lester

    lol your such a lyer, PS3 games arent more expensive, their all $60 new, same as 360 games. LIVE isnt funner, its no different but you pay for it, stupid aint it? PS3 has no cons, it has all the things the 360 has now, but the 360 doesnt have much the PS3 has. Headsets dont even come with Arcade versions anymore. So you cant say that anymore. And hes just being nice on the HD drive for 360, that was $160 until they stopped making HDDVDs, then it got a drop.

  19. Comment by Robert941 — November 17, 2010 @ 1:03 am

    Tom

    He is not a fanboy, there is just nothing you need to pay for on the PS3 to get what the 360 has. There are no cons. He might as well put HDMI cables now because 360 doesnt come with those on the Arcade since its release and now dont come with the new Elites. 360 HDMI is $50, but a PS3 can use any HDMI cables, only $10, and its the only system with ANY 1080p in media, and TRUE 1080p in games.

    So might as well add $40 more on the 360 Bufalax, lol

  20. Comment by leefbeef — November 17, 2010 @ 4:02 pm

    Gina

    whats balls

  21. Comment by beehivethe3rd — November 18, 2010 @ 2:43 pm

    Sarah

    you are being a fan boy, you say all the cons of the xbox 360 but you don’t say any about the ps3.

  22. Comment by tgizzle829 — November 20, 2010 @ 3:09 pm

    Joyce

    i would go for ps3 slim cause you can sell it for more cuase its a newer model and you get better resale for it

  23. Comment by swag213 — November 21, 2010 @ 5:08 am

    Anna

    dis ***** other me is fuking *** ***** u suck

  24. Comment by Dolian112 — November 23, 2010 @ 4:41 am

    Vincent

    you also forgot headsets…that moost ps3 games that are 30 bucks are 20 on 360 and the 360 also has updates. Though the ps3 does have blue ray and most other stuf all you did was compare accesories…plus live is funner. The ps3 does also have a little better graphics and good exclusive games but you keep saying the cons on the 360 side but no cons on the ps3. no fanboyism my ***.

  25. Comment by Dolian112 — November 23, 2010 @ 6:03 am

    Gerald

    wtf dude go to walmart and it says 299 on the elite in america where r u from

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

mortgage home equity loans | webinar services | cheap air tickets